Once you’ve downloaded the plugin, you can launch the editor for any page or post:Īll in all, this editor has a straightforward design that allows you to create pages and posts efficiently. Beaver Builderīeaver Builder has an intuitive design, and lets you create websites quickly and easily using the front-end drag-and-drop page builder. With that in mind, let’s discuss how Beaver Builder and Visual Composer compare when it comes to user-friendliness. You’ll be using it constantly, so it’s vital that this tool is easy to understand and use. Ease of UseĪ page builder completely changes the way you create content for your websites. We’ll start by looking closer at what it’s like to use each of these tools. Now that you know a little bit about each page builder, it’s time to compare them more directly in five key areas.

Beaver Builder vs Visual Composer: 5 Key Aspects Compared Just like Beaver Builder, it is also compatible with custom post types, and has a mobile-friendly design. You can use Visual Composer to create full layouts, as well as many types of pages and posts.

This plugin is known for its flexibility and capacity to integrate smoothly with other tools, most notably WooCommerce and many popular themes. Visual Composer is a page builder that has been on the market for over a decade.

When I build pages with Visual Composer all this content is ignored, with no trace of. What I know so far is that the correct page template is being used, both in Visual Composer and Classic Editor: Is there a way to avoid that, loading the Visual Composer-built contant within a container, keeping the remaining template-content? And is Visual Composer in fact supposed to override the page template file completely? If I change to the Classic Editor the page template loads fine, with the page template-code there. But the code isn't loaded or visible in the source code front end. I have built a page in Visual Composer, with some code written directly in the page template-file.

Visual composer download page template